Managers & supervisors
Understand the environmental responsibilities increasingly built into operational roles.
Gain practical, regulated knowledge to help identify, manage and improve environmental performance across your organisation.
Designed for managers, supervisors and developing professionals who need a clear understanding of organisational environmental management.
Understand the environmental responsibilities increasingly built into operational roles.
Broaden your remit where environmental management overlaps with compliance and risk.
Build awareness of impacts, controls, legislation, monitoring and improvement.
Create a regulated foundation before moving into higher-level sustainability roles.
The ProQual unit contains eight major learning outcomes. SHEC Learning® presents them as eight clear learning modules.
60-question multiple-choice examination
90 minutes available
Pass / fail result
This is SHEC Learning®’s current approved-centre delivery arrangement.
ProQual describes internally assessed evidence across the qualification, with external quality assurance. Permitted methods include assignments, projects, reports, worksheets, portfolio evidence and questioning.
Progression should reflect your experience, responsibilities and career direction—not simply follow the next number.
Core environmental-management knowledge for emerging responsibility.
For experienced practitioners with broader sustainability responsibility.
Explore Level 6 →For senior leaders shaping environmental strategy and organisational performance.
Explore Level 7 →A regulated Level 3 qualification providing foundation knowledge in organisational environmental management.
603/6603/5.
There is one mandatory ProQual unit. Its eight major learning outcomes are structured by SHEC as eight learning modules.
30 Total Qualification Time hours, including 20 Guided Learning Hours.
ProQual specifies no formal entry requirements.
No. It is a foundation knowledge Award and does not by itself demonstrate occupational competence.
SHEC Learning® delivers the course entirely through e-learning, with six months of course access.
The current SHEC Learning® offer uses a 60-question multiple-choice examination with 90 minutes available.
It introduces relevant environmental-management-system and ISO-standard concepts. It does not make you an ISO 14001-certified auditor.
Yes, particularly where environmental responsibility is becoming part of the role. As an entry-level e-learning course, no suitability assessment is required.
Enrol online or speak with SHEC Learning® about your environmental career pathway.
Show the competence you demonstrate through real occupational activity. Risk assessments, inspections, investigations, reports, policies and everyday professional work can all contribute when they meet the assessment requirements.
SHEC Learning® · Start with your actual responsibilities and genuine evidence.
Evidence may include workplace products, documents, observation, projects, reports, assignments, professional discussion, witness testimony, questioning, worksheets, prior learning and appropriate self-assessment. Each item must help establish your achievement of the relevant criteria.
It represents real activity and your own contribution. The assessor can establish what happened and what you did.
It helps demonstrate particular outcomes or criteria at the required qualification level.
Together, your evidence covers every required outcome and criterion. One document rarely proves an entire unit on its own.
Evidence is required across the qualification, but you do not necessarily need a separate document for every criterion. One well-evidenced project can support several related requirements.
Level 3 evidence should show your involvement in practical workplace activities. The examples below are possibilities, not a fixed shopping list for every learner.
Examples:Investigation reports, witness information, photographs, corrective actions and follow-up records.
Can demonstrate:Your investigation activity, recommendations and review of actions.
Common mistake:Submitting somebody else’s investigation without establishing your role.
Examples:Task or workplace assessments, relevant COSHH or manual-handling assessments, hazard records and control reviews.
Can demonstrate:How you identify hazards, evaluate risk, recommend controls and check implementation.
Common mistake:Uploading a form without showing your involvement or what happened next.
Examples:Safe systems, method statements, operating instructions, permit arrangements and procedure revisions.
Can demonstrate:Why controls were needed, who was consulted and how procedures were implemented.
Common mistake:Providing a generic procedure you have never used or helped develop.
Examples:Inspections, observations, action trackers, safety tours and closure records.
Can demonstrate:How you identify issues, assign actions and verify improvements.
Common mistake:Showing an inspection with no evidence of follow-up.
Examples:Toolbox talks, briefings, inductions, alerts, presentations, consultation and workforce feedback.
Can demonstrate:Your contribution to communication, involvement and safer working practices.
Common mistake:Supplying material without explaining whether you prepared, delivered or used it.
Level 6 evidence should demonstrate professional judgement and the systems you develop, influence, implement or review across an organisation.
Examples:Policy reviews, gap analyses, consultation, approvals, implementation and improvement records.
Can demonstrate:Your professional involvement in developing, implementing or reviewing policy.
Common mistake:Uploading the company policy without evidence of your contribution.
Examples:Complex assessments, risk registers, control strategies, prioritisation and risk-reduction projects.
Can demonstrate:Professional decisions, implementation and organisational risk control.
Common mistake:Relying only on isolated routine forms.
Examples:Consultation arrangements, committee structures, reporting systems, dashboards and escalation records.
Can demonstrate:How information reaches the people who need it and informs action.
Common mistake:Showing messages without explaining the system or your responsibility.
Examples:Training-needs analyses, competency matrices, role profiles, development plans and contractor competence reviews.
Can demonstrate:How competence needs are identified, developed and reviewed.
Common mistake:Providing attendance certificates alone.
Examples:Audit programmes, inspection systems, planned schedules, monitoring data and corrective-action systems.
Can demonstrate:How you identify and address weaknesses before incidents occur.
Common mistake:Showing one inspection without the wider monitoring arrangements.
Examples:Investigations, near-miss analysis, incident trends, management reports and lessons learned.
Can demonstrate:How events and performance information lead to organisational improvements.
Common mistake:Providing statistics without analysis or follow-up.
Examples:Emergency plans, fire and first-aid arrangements, drills, debriefs and response reviews.
Can demonstrate:Your role in planning, testing and improving emergency systems.
Common mistake:Uploading a plan with no evidence of implementation or review.
Examples:Management reviews, annual reports, KPIs, board reports, audit reviews and improvement plans.
Can demonstrate:How you evaluate performance and recommend or implement change.
Common mistake:Showing a dashboard without explaining conclusions and decisions.
Examples:CPD records, reflection, development goals, training, reading, webinars and evidence of applied learning.
Can demonstrate:How you maintain competence and use new knowledge to improve practice.
Common mistake:Listing activities without explaining learning or application.
Explain which sections, actions or decisions were yours, who else contributed and how the work was used.
Add context showing advice, consultation, escalation, assigned actions or follow-up alongside the main evidence.
Identify your recommendations, decisions and actions. Attendance alone may not demonstrate competence.
Explain the condition, your assessment, recommended action and outcome. Link images to the relevant records.
A structured assessment conversation about what you did, why, relevant requirements, alternatives, communication, outcomes and learning. It is more than an informal chat.
A suitable witness describes activities they directly observed you carrying out. Your assessor checks its relevance and sufficiency.
Existing or earlier work may help where it is authentic, relevant and suitable against current requirements. Acceptance is an assessment decision, not automatic.
Identify the health and safety responsibilities you genuinely hold.
Understand the knowledge and competence you need to demonstrate.
Look at the work products and activities you already produce.
Identify which requirements each item can genuinely support.
Find areas where the evidence is missing or insufficient.
Use legitimate opportunities to develop and demonstrate any outstanding competence.
One real improvement project may involve investigation, risk assessment, recommendations, management reporting, revised procedures, communication, monitoring and review. Your assessor decides how the evidence maps across the qualification.
Generic templates you have never used, blank forms, downloaded documents, fictional assessments, unsupported screenshots and someone else’s work presented as your own do not demonstrate your competence.
Where permitted, AI can help organise your own notes, improve grammar, structure a genuine report or clarify a presentation. It must not invent inspections, incidents, risk assessments, meetings, emails, witness evidence, responsibilities or decisions.
The underlying activity must be real, and your assessor must be able to establish your contribution.
Workplace evidence may contain personal, medical, commercial, client or security information. Follow your organisation’s confidentiality, information-security and document-sharing rules.
Discuss restrictions with your assessor before uploading material. Appropriate options may include redaction, anonymisation, summaries, controlled review or alternative evidence.
Keep enough context for the assessor to understand and authenticate the activity. Obtain permission where required and do not assume restrictions make an NVQ impossible.
Carry out or contribute to investigations, risk assessments, procedures, monitoring, communications and practical improvements. View the Level 3 NVQ →
Develop or influence policy, systems, organisational competence, risk arrangements, proactive and reactive monitoring, emergency systems and performance review. View the Level 6 NVQ →
Occasional operational tasks may not yet support Level 6. If you lack suitable evidence, develop experience or genuine responsibilities, consider another level, or choose a knowledge-led qualification.
Be ready to discuss your job, safety responsibilities, autonomy, risk assessments, inspections or audits, investigations, procedures, communications, monitoring, reports, meetings, training, emergency arrangements and improvement projects.
For Level 6, explain the breadth of your organisational responsibility. You do not need to send your entire company filing system.
SHEC Learning® helps establish whether your role can realistically support the qualification.
Map existing work and present suitable evidence clearly.
Use assessor feedback and professional discussion to address genuine gaps as your portfolio develops.
Evidence depends on your level and role. It can include risk assessments, investigations, inspections, reports, policies, procedures, communications and monitoring records from genuine work.
Yes. Authentic occupational evidence is fundamental to health and safety NVQ competence assessment. Exams or hypothetical assignments alone are not enough.
Yes, where they demonstrate relevant competence and your personal involvement. Your assessor may also need to see how controls were implemented and reviewed.
Potentially. Use them with context to show genuine advice, consultation, decisions, assigned actions or follow-up.
Yes, as supporting evidence. Explain the activity, your role, the decisions taken and what happened afterwards.
They may demonstrate consultation, recommendations, decisions and follow-up. Attendance alone may not establish competence.
A suitable witness can describe relevant work they directly observed. Your assessor decides whether the testimony is appropriate and sufficient.
A structured assessment conversation explaining what you did, why you did it, how you decided and what you learned. It helps demonstrate reasoning that documents may not show.
Potentially, through recognition of prior learning and assessment. Your assessor checks authenticity, relevance and whether it demonstrates competence against current requirements.
Not necessarily. Shared documents can be useful, but your assessor must establish your personal contribution and decisions.
Written work and reports can support assessment, but hypothetical assignments alone do not demonstrate genuine occupational competence.
AI must not fabricate professional activity or workplace records. Any permitted assistance must preserve the authenticity of work you actually completed.
Discuss restrictions with your assessor. Redaction, anonymisation, controlled review or alternative evidence may be appropriate while preserving enough context to authenticate the work.
There is no fixed number that proves competence. The portfolio must provide sufficient coverage of the required outcomes and assessment criteria.
Yes, where it genuinely demonstrates them. Your assessor decides how evidence is mapped, and whether other evidence is needed.
You may need more experience, wider genuine responsibilities, further development or a different route. Never invent evidence to fill gaps.
Yes. Start with an evidence and suitability discussion about your role and responsibilities. You do not need a perfectly organised portfolio or your whole company filing system.
You may have more useful evidence than you realise. Tell SHEC Learning® about your responsibilities so we can help establish whether Level 3 or Level 6 appears suitable before you commit to enrolment.
Health & Safety Qualifications →· Career Pathway →· WhatsApp enquiry →
Becoming a fire risk assessor requires more than learning how to complete a form. Professional competence develops through fire-safety knowledge, appropriate qualifications, practical experience, professional judgement, accurate reporting, continuing professional development and working within the limits of your competence.
There is no single route for everyone. Your right starting point depends on what you can already demonstrate.
Your existing knowledge and experience determine where development should begin. General Health & Safety experience is valuable, but it does not automatically prove occupational fire-risk-assessment competence.
Build a Foundation-level understanding before progressing into supervised assessment activity and real building experience.
Use transferable risk skills while developing specific fire-safety knowledge, building understanding and practical FRA experience.
Develop specialist competence around the premises, occupants, management systems and fire precautions you work with.
Map current evidence against modern competence expectations, identify genuine gaps and progress at the appropriate level.
Foundation development for people building specific fire-risk-assessment knowledge.
Intermediate development with substantially more practical competence and professional reporting.
The government has committed to introducing mandatory independent certification for fire risk assessors in England. The consultation closed on 18 June 2026. As of September 2026, the final framework and implementation arrangements have not yet been brought into force.
This means fire risk assessment is not currently a regulated profession with mandatory certification, although assessors must still be competent for the work they undertake and duty holders must ensure assessments are suitable and sufficient.
This section should be reviewed when government proposals or legislation change.
Structured learning and assessment against defined outcomes, awarded by a regulated awarding organisation.
Independent verification of competence against the rules and standards of a certification scheme.
Recognition through a professional register or body, normally subject to competence, conduct and CPD requirements.
Completing a SHEC qualification does not automatically provide certification, professional registration or unrestricted competence.
✓ Observe experienced and competent assessors.
✓ Begin with simpler, lower-risk premises.
✓ Complete supervised assessment activity.
✓ Receive feedback on findings and reports.
✓ Build evidence across different premises and scenarios.
✓ Develop knowledge of construction and fire protection.
✓ Increase complexity gradually.
✓ Refer work beyond your competence to specialists.
No single degree route is required. You need relevant knowledge, training, experience and other qualities appropriate to the work you undertake.
Yes, but general H&S experience alone is not enough. You must develop fire-specific knowledge and supervised practical experience.
Yes. Facilities and property experience can be a strong starting point, provided fire-specific competence is developed and evidenced.
Potentially. Current ProQual entry permits the Level 3 Award or at least three years’ proven occupational fire-risk-assessment experience, subject to suitability assessment.
Knowledge can be developed online, but professional competence also requires practical experience, assessment activity and evidence that cannot be replaced by online study alone.
There is no universal timescale. It depends on your starting knowledge, access to practical experience, qualification route and the scope of work you intend to undertake.
It is a framework describing competence for individual fire risk assessors at Foundation, Intermediate and Advanced levels. It is not itself a qualification or a step-by-step assessment method.
No. Competence must always be matched to the premises, risks and complexity of the assessment.
Tell SHEC about your background, experience and intended role. We will help you identify the development route that matches what you can already demonstrate.